Hispana Vista / Several weeks ago, "The Alternative in Movement" was announced—a gathering scheduled for June 22nd that aims to bring together various groups united by their critical patriotism and commitment to social equity. What motivated you to organize this event?
We've observed that political activism has evolved significantly in recent years. We've moved from a small cluster of parties advocating for patriotic values and social fairness to a diverse ecosystem of associations and independent initiatives. Many prefer to channel their engagement through cultural, sports, or community service activities rather than strictly political structures.
We believe many organizations across Spain are working in different spheres yet share common ideological foundations, though their projects lack coordination. We think it's valuable for these initiatives to connect, share their experiences, and discuss their projects together.
Have the discussion forums that have been held periodically in Madrid and Barcelona played any role in this?
Not directly, although the positive personal relationships among members of different groups—strengthened through those forums and other initiatives—have certainly facilitated the coordination of this Congress.
Which collectives or associations have been invited but have not yet confirmed their participation in "The Alternative in Movement"? Who has declined the invitation? What stands out about those who have already joined?
Not many groups have declined to participate in this gathering, though there have been a few. We prefer to remain discreet about them and the reasons behind their decisions, which are respectable in any case.
Among the confirmed participating groups so far—around twenty—the diversity of their operational fields is notable. There are cultural associations, media outlets, publishers, trade unions, mountaineering groups, professional associations, and more. Essentially, a broad spectrum where activist commitment can be developed.
Why haven't any political parties confirmed participation as attendees in this gathering?
The purpose of the congress is precisely to examine, among other matters, this emerging model of political engagement through associations rather than through parties. We want to gauge the perspective of all these collectives to understand the rationale behind their operational approach.
What will the June 22nd gathering of "The Alternative in Movement" consist of?
Throughout the day, participating groups that wish to will have a space to promote their initiatives and connect with potential collaborators.
Visitors will also be able to view an art exhibition we've titled "Activist Art," featuring artists from various disciplines—architecture, painting, sculpture—recognized for their political commitment to National Syndicalism.
Simultaneously, several panel discussions will take place with speakers from the different participating organizations.
There will also be raffles and contests.
Is there already an official program for the event?
In the coming days, the program will be released with the proposed topics for the panel discussions.
On "The Alternative in Movement" website, there's a "Documents" section. Have the organizers considered publishing what is presented that day?
That section is actually intended to collect materials prior to the Congress—designs, logos, programs, etc. We do intend to record the panel discussions to later distribute them on video.
What ultimate goal do you hope to achieve with "The Alternative in Movement"?
Some have interpreted this Congress as the launch of a political platform integrating the groups that have announced their participation. This is not the case. This initiative simply aims to create a space for dialogue, exchanging experiences, and sharing projects. Nothing more.
We would be delighted if some or all participating groups could reach collaborative agreements. But that is not the objective of the gathering.
37 Responses to Interview with the Organizers of "The Alternative in Movement"
In the blue world, as in all political families, there are constructive individuals and troublemakers. Polite and rude. Anonymous and well-known. In this, we are no different from others. Neither better nor worse. Perhaps not the best starting point for those aspiring to promote major changes or revolutions.
I'll make two points, with permission:
1.- Conducting an interview with anonymous representatives of any movement sounds odd for any media outlet. It diminishes the credibility of the interviewee (hidden in anonymity) and adds nothing to Hispana Vista's good reputation and content. Anonymity only fosters speculation. It clouds the atmosphere rather than building positive expectations.
2.- Each group contributes—if they wish to make any commitment—the best of their heritage. Gallos de Marzo has a valuable connection point with the generation of Falanges Juveniles (which were well-populated with activists seen up close but close to 0 in electoral terms). It contributes the extraordinary intellectual formation of many of its members. It also contributes its reservations about revisiting political initiatives born without resolving (through naivety or ignorance) the errors of a past rich in blue failures. If we don't learn to respect both the poster hanger and the 'community manager' as necessary parts of the same political community, or if we think the former has lesser priority in decisions than the latter or vice versa, then we'd better leave politics—even noble politics—in the hands of those capable of understanding each other. Let's go back to backstabbing, feuds, and vilification, at which we've shown considerable skill.
More questions:
Will attendees be charged admission?
Will there be stalls for books, magazines, crafts, music, etc.?
Thank you very much and regards
I see that the boldest statements always tend to come from those who don't back their words with their own person, hiding under names that aren't publicly known.
I've read the comments briefly, and I won't say anything that might weaken the spirit of the Falange.
I will defend Gallos de Marzo. And I don't do it out of friendship and camaraderie that unites me with them. I do it in defense of the truth I know, because I've witnessed how they usually organize these June gatherings well in advance. Last year alone, we were notified several months ahead about such an event for June 16, which would later coincide with the Social Defense event on that same day in Madrid. And they decided not to change it despite knowing there was an earlier gathering.
That's my knowledge of things and that's how I tell them. I believe we shouldn't make statements that seem to hint at bad intentions in comrades or groups so freely.
A hug. For a Society of Free Men.